2010/5/10 Matthias Pfützner <matth...@pfuetzner.de>: > Worse, quoting himself as proof... ;-)
Matthias Pfützner: http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-discuss/2010-May/056462.html --->> A [ ] You are able to read B [ ] ... ??? > > You(Jennifer Pioch) wrote: >> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Dave Johnson >> <dave.johnson.inqu...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> > This is how Oracle treats open communities and projects. Will OGB >> > intervene? >> > >> > David >> > >> > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> > From: Dave Johnson <dave.johnson.inqu...@googlemail.com> >> > Date: Mon, May 10, 2010 at 12:44 PM >> > Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] [desktop-discuss] 2010.03, when will it be >> > available? >> > To: "Richard L. Hamilton" <rlha...@smart.net> >> > Cc: opensolaris-disc...@opensolaris.org, indiana-disc...@opensolaris.org >> > >> > >> > On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Richard L. Hamilton <rlha...@smart.net> >> > wrote: >> >>> Slide 22 is also very interesting and gives me a lot >> >>> of reassurance: >> >>> >> >>> OpenSolaris >> >>> • Oracle will continue to make OpenSolaris available >> >>> as open source and >> >>> Oracle will continue to actively support and >> >>> participate in the >> >>> OpenSolaris community >> >>> • Oracle is investing more in Solaris than Sun did >> >>> prior to the >> >>> acquisition, and will continue to contribute >> >>> innovative technologies to >> >>> OpenSolaris, as Oracle already does for many other >> >>> open source projects >> >>> >> >>> Coming from Oracle there's no longer any doubt that >> >>> it will be alright. >> >>> I'm going to be an OpenSolairs user for quite some >> >>> time to come. ;-) >> >> >> >> While that presentation was indeed reassuring, from the >> >> reactions I've seen so far, many seem to hope that >> >> "participate in the OpenSolaris community" would include >> >> less restrictive communication than it appears is allowed >> >> by the current application of their policies to OpenSolaris. >> >> >> >> I see open source plus community meaning, when it wouldn't >> >> compromise competitive information about a pending product, >> >> that the development process and activity is also open, to include >> >> some information about _planned_ components thereof, as well. >> >> >> >> One of the many reasons for more open communication is that >> >> outside contributors should be entitled to a little courtesy when >> >> their work is affected (look at ksh93-discuss to see a case of that). >> > >> > Oracle doesn't want the command modernisation and ksh93 projects. They >> > had too much community influence in the past, are too independent and >> > Oracle wants to replace the Solaris commands in usr/bin with GNU >> > commands. Oracle has already decided that in February and now try to >> > get rid of the projects by denying them repository access. >> > The projects are dead. There is enough evidence what Oracle is planning. >> > >> > Dave >> >> Where's your "evidence", troll? >> >> Jenny >> -- >> Jennifer Pioch, Uni Frankfurt >> _______________________________________________ >> indiana-discuss mailing list >> indiana-disc...@opensolaris.org >> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss >> > > -- > Matthias Pfützner | mailto:pfu...@germany | Ich glaube nicht, daß ich > �...@work: +49 6103 752-394 | @home: +49 6151 75717 | Frauen je begreifen > werde. > SunCS, Ampèrestraße 6 | Lichtenbergstraße 73 | > 63225 Langen, FRG | 64289 Darmstadt, FRG | Federico Fellini > _______________________________________________ > indiana-discuss mailing list > indiana-disc...@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss > _______________________________________________ ogb-discuss mailing list ogb-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ogb-discuss
