ksh-93 project leaders*,

*OpenSolaris community member* Dave Johnson*, on Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:50
AM *asked that the OGB intervene*:
*Oracle doesn't want the command modernisation and ksh93 projects. They
had too much community influence in the past, are too independent and
Oracle wants to replace the Solaris commands in usr/bin with GNU
commands. Oracle has already decided that in February and now try to
get rid of the projects by denying them repository access.
The projects are dead. There is enough evidence what Oracle is planning.*
This is how Oracle treats open communities and projects. Will OGB intervene?

Dave referenced ARC and ON discussions that show JohnS withdrawing
PSARC/2009/660 and JBeck's statement that, as ON community leader, "*conversion
of any *new* utilities to ksh93 is on hold*".

The OpenSolaris constitution we just adopted limits the actions and ability
of the OGB to intervene in a community's internal operation:

====
3.1 Disputes

It is expected and encouraged that groups will resolve disputes by
themselves according to their documented decision-making procedures.
If a dispute can not be resolved within a group or it spreads between
groups, then the Governing Board may choose to intervene. The Board
will consider disputes on a case-by-case basis and may decline to
intervene. If the Board chooses to intervene, it will resolve the
issue at its absolute discretion with no possibility of appeal. Its
resolution will be binding on all parties.
====

Towards that end, I (on behalf of the OGB) would like to ask the ksh-93
project leaders to first determine if there *is* a problem, and, if so, to
work with the individuals and/or other groups involved to address,
understand and resolve it before involving the OGB.  I would be happy to
help facilitate your efforts to do this, but the constitution is pretty
clear that it is up to you to try and resolve things first.  Towards that
end, I will start by asking where your project's decision making processes
are defined, where those of other projects are defined, and whether or not
they were followed...  Note in all of this that the OGB is an arbiter of
community governance, not of technical disputes.

After all that, if there still is a governance problem that can not be
resolved, let me know and I will work with you, the leaders of the ksh-93
community, as needed to determine how to move forward.

  -John Plocher
   OGB Chair
_______________________________________________
ogb-discuss mailing list
ogb-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ogb-discuss

Reply via email to