>From: "Tim Dugger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >On 25 Jan 01, Brad scribbled a note about RE: Domain Abuse (was RE: >[ogf-d20-: > > > Let your own works and view stand on their own merits, and not > > under the coat-tails of the OGF. > >hehehee..... heheheheee..... > >It seems to me that this is exactly what every company producing >d20 products is doing, riding on the coat-tails of the OGF and the >d20 SRD................ I was TRYING to ignore the irony of that statement . . . Faust _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ) Faustus von Goethe
- RE: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ) Woodman, Wayne 709 724-6101
- RE: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ... Tim Dugger
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ) Pax Harmonica
- RE: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ... Lynn Fredricks
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ) Pax Harmonica
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ) Margaret C Vining
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ) Faustus von Goethe
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ... John J. Kaufman
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ... Doug Meerschaert
- RE: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ) Faustus von Goethe
- RE: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ) Natalie G. Stockard
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ) Faustus von Goethe
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ) Chris
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ) Faustus von Goethe
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ... Mike Looney
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ) Faustus von Goethe
- [ogf-d20-l] Simple question(s) Max Skibinsky
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] Simple question(s) Doug Meerschaert
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] Simple question(s... Max Skibinsky
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] Simple questi... Infinite Possibilities
