>Alec A. Burkhardt
>
>OGL#2 says you cannot have an additional license that applies to Open Game
>Content.  Having not seen the license in R&R, I assumed from Clark's post
>that the new license is in regards to the use of the spell names.  Spell
>names are not automatically Open Game Content but can be designated as
>Product Identity.  If this is what has been done with the license in R&R
>it is exactly in keeping with the spirit of the OGL as it has been
>discussed on this list.

Ahhhh. I see.

That opens up possibilities for lots of little sub-license twists.

Faust
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

Reply via email to