When I noticed that it went away, I assumed it had been revoked. I expect that they won't care much about existing uses, but will probably take a less-lenient view of new works once the d20 STL is finalized. -Brad > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Damian > Smart > Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 9:58 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [ogf-d20-l] [d20] Online Use Policy > > > At 02:45 PM 2/20/01 +0000, Faustus von Goethe wrote: > > Perhaps it has been "rescinded". > > Didn't Ryan say it was going away once the OGL/d20 were finalized? > > -Damian
- [ogf-d20-l] [d20] Online Use Policy Nicholas H.M. Caldwell
- RE: [ogf-d20-l] [d20] Online Use Policy Marable, Ken
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] [d20] Online Use Policy Faustus von Goethe
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] [d20] Online Use Policy Damian Smart
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] [d20] Online Use Polic... Brad Thompson
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] [d20] Online Use Policy Faustus von Goethe
- [ogf-d20-l] OT: What did SSS pay for thing... John Campbell
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] OT: What did SSS pay f... Aeon
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] OT: What did SSS p... John Campbell
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] OT: What did ... R. Hyrum Savage
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] OT: What ... David Bolack
- RE: [ogf-d20-l] OT: W... Matt Totney-Roberts
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] OT: What did ... Aeon
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] OT: What did ... WD Smith Jr
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] OT: What ... lizard
