On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 05:20:41AM -0500, Martin L. Shoemaker wrote:
>
> Let me be contrary: no, this is NOT the place for such a debate. I would say
> the place for that debate is the forums on www.fixgama.org.
I'm not sure this is the place for the debate, but I am also sure that
fixgama.org is also not the place for the debate. Fixgama.org is a
Website that makes, as a starting point, the assumption that GAMA needs
fixing. If you want to debate that specific point, I'd have to say
that there are better places to do it.
I also find that it's a bad idea to debate hot topics like this on a
forum controlled by someone who is the primary advocate for one side
or the other. This is a general rule of thumb, and should not be taken
as a slam of Ryan -- it's just a bad idea in general.
--
Bryant Durrell [] http://www.innocence.com/~durrell [] 9/11/2001
[----------------------------------------------------------------------------]
"This time next year we'll be tanned muscle-bound aikido-master
genius stud philosophers." -- A. M. Heublein
_______________________________________________
Ogf-l mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
