----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Spike Y Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


> On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 09:17:58 EST
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > If there are PI licenses, then you probably have to specifically
> > note which portions of the text are PI and belong to someone else.
> >
> > So, for example, let's say I come up with a superhero called the
> > "Great Guffaw".  I PI his name and his background.  I give
> > somebody a PI license.  20 iterations down the road a book comes
> > out under the OGL.  If it has the "Great Guffaw" in it, it should
> > probably note that it is the PI of Lee Valentine, used
> > with permission, derived from "Lee's Book of Superheroes".
> >
> > How would somebody not know that this was my PI?!!
>
> Unfortunately, not all PI licenses will follow that form. If the
> license only requires you to say "PI taken from Book X is used with
> permission," the people further down the OGC chain won't know what
> bits of the book are PI. In the case of The Great Guffaw (if your PI
> license took this form), the third party would know that there's some
> PI in Book Y that was taken from "Lee's Book of Superheroes," but he
> wouldn't know exactly what that PI happened to be.
>
> (And the suggestion that he buy a copy of both Book Y and "Lee's Book
> of Superheroes" and then spend some hours line-by-line cross-checking
> the two to see what material is common to the two of them is
> ridiculous.)

Shame we don't have that online OGC library, Spike. It would probably take about 10
seconds, per rule, if you could Google the name of a rule and find out the origional
author and book.

David Shepheard
_______________________________________________
Ogf-l mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l

Reply via email to