<<One interpretation of the license (the one favoured by Ryan Dancey,
among others) is that the license only applies to the Open Content
within a book, not that which isn't a part of the Open Content.>>
This seems to defy the definition of OGC in the license, Spike. It seems that everything in the work that isn't PI is OGC. The only time I can see less than an entire work 100% categorized as PI and OGC (if the author handled his declarations appropriately) is in a compiled work, where one internal work is covered, but all the other works are not. Then the license is still scoped at the level of the work per the actual definition of OGC.
Again, the OGL scope is determined via reference to the OGC definition which seems scoped to the entirety of the work minus the PI.
Lee
_______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
