On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 14:07:12 -0500 "Tim Dugger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12 Aug 2005 at 13:47, Spike Y Jones wrote: > > > > This way you are officially declaring the source of your terms, > > > which also indicates that you are NOT using anybody else's PI. > > > > Depending on which reading of the PI terms of the license you go > > with, doing this isn't necessarily going to get you anywhere. > > It will however be the start of a path that indicates that what > somebody else declared as PI is not the source of your use of those > terms. And that will help in case there is an issue over it.
Unfortunately, one of the two main readings of the PI terms of the OGL is that you, by borrowing *any* OGC from some other publisher, agree not to use *any* terms that he claims as PI, whether you could source those from elsewhere or not. If the judge doesn't agree with your reading of the OGL, then your sidebar won't give you much cover. Spike Y Jones _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
