<<Not sure how long they've been doing this (and if it was included when they
did their 2 or so OGL'ed articles, and any OGL'ed ads), but I recall seeing
it for quite a long time now.
>>
Thanks for the info, Ken. I wonder if they used to do that, but I'll leave Woodelf to do the research on that.
In any case, I think that the OGL does not automatically apply in full to all parts of a bundle. I think that it applies:
a) only where is explicitly applied AND ALSO
b) it prohibits advertising compatibility with trademarks "in conjunction with" a covered work
To me, the discussion really starts and ends there, and WotC's FAQ is wrong even if there isn't a single OGL'd article in any of their publications. The latter isn't what makes there FAQ wrong -- that part of their FAQ is just wrong. Such a publication would only prove that they don't even believe their FAQ.
Lee
_______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
