On Sun, 4 Sep 2005, Ryan S. Dancey wrote: > > Can I say the "work" is just chapters 2 and 4? Or, in > > your view, does the "work" mean the whole book? > > The intent of the license is that it apply to all chapters. > > This is a required interpretation. Otherwise, it would be possible to put > the things that we didn't want you to be able say like "This product is > compatible with Dungeons & Dragons(R)" on the cover and claim that it was > not a part of the "work" covered by the OGL.
If this is the case, then there's no such thing as the "third type of content" and a whole bunch of stuff has been published under the OGL using an incorrect interpretation of the license. I wonder if the fact that WotC hasn't taken any steps in the past five years to correct this misinterpretation would work against the company if it tried to start enforcing this interpretation now. Spike Y Jones _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
