From: "woodelf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
So, a magazine that has a single OGC-containing article coudn't use trademarks anywhere in the magazine to indicate compatibility or co-adaptability. It couldn't have an article in that issue about "New Races for ShadowRun(tm)"?
That's a correct interpretation. Otherwise, people who wanted to circumvent the license limitations would be able to call their products "magazines".
Which makes sense. But they've since claimed that a "web enhancement" is just as much a part of the original work as something that is physically bundled with it.
In my opinion, that's an incorrect and unenforceable interpretation of the license.
And they've made it quite clear that they don't want to prohibit a magazine having some WotC OGL-using articles, and some "regular" articles.
While they might like to enable that potential, the license does not permit it.
Ryan
_______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
