> Perhaps there is a neutral phrase that WotC would approve beyond the > "Requires the PHB", something like "intended for use with D&D" would be > nice, but I think the d20 will be plenty valuable as a consumer mark without > it. You have a good point and that may help clear up some issues, but then again it might hurt as well. Maybe if we could put that on the cover along with the fact that it rwquires the PHB. *shrug* -- Jeff Visgaitis Art Director Roc Games www.roc-games.com ------------- For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org
- Re: [Open_Gaming] single most valuable equity asset? Faustus von Goethe
- Re: [Open_Gaming] single most valuable equity asset? Faustus von Goethe
- Re: [Open_Gaming] single most valuable equity as... Kal Lin
- Re: [Open_Gaming] single most valuable equit... Kevin J. Brennan
- Re: [Open_Gaming] single most valuable e... Jeffrey J. Visgaitis
- Re: [Open_Gaming] single most valuab... Kevin J. Brennan
- RE: [Open_Gaming] single most v... Brad Thompson
- RE: [Open_Gaming] single mo... Kal Lin
- Re: [Open_Gaming] single mo... Jeffrey J. Visgaitis
- Re: [Open_Gaming] single most v... Jeffrey J. Visgaitis
- RE: [Open_Gaming] single most valuable equity asset? Troll Lord
- RE: [Open_Gaming] single most valuable equity asset? Faustus von Goethe
- Re: [Open_Gaming] single most valuable equity asset? Troll Lord
- RE: [Open_Gaming] single most valuable equity asset? Troll Lord
- RE: [Open_Gaming] single most valuable equity asset? Troll Lord
- Re: [Open_Gaming] single most valuable equity asset? AndyHughey
- RE: [Open_Gaming] single most valuable equity as... Brad Thompson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] single most valuable equity asset? Faustus von Goethe
- Re: [Open_Gaming] single most valuable equity as... Ryan S. Dancey
