From: Walter Christensen
>>Example:
>>Let's say you produce a MUD engine that uses the d20SRD as its base
>>with no modifications. In this case you would produce a document
>>containing just the d20SRD, since that is the entirety of the OGL
>>work you used. If you had used the d20SRD and added a new class,
>>then you would produce a document that contained the d20SRD as well
>>as a write-up of the new class.
From: Kal Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Are you assuming the new class now becomes OGL content?
>If yes, then does classes added by print producers become
>OGL content? If no, then how does this contribute anything
>to the OGL community.
I am assuming that the new class used previously produced OGL material such
as the d20SRD. Given this, the new class *must* be OGL. If the new class
was *not* OGL, then there would be no need to include it in the
human-readable document that is produced (though it certainly could be, as
part of a "larger work").
From: Kal Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>That's what I read, too. Thanks for a good example to illustrate some
>more issues.
No prob. Thanks for expressing your appreciation. It's nice to find people
who actually give positive comments in a mailing list.
Walter
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
-------------
For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org
