From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Faustus von
Goethe
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 5:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Open_Gaming] Non-D20 Reference Documents
<< >As
>you are likely to become aware should you inadvertently use WW/SSS PI in
>your database and refuse to comply with their request to fix the
>error. >>
...
<< >Their lawyers will win, your lawyer will win & they will win; you
>will lose.
Only insofar as I will have to take my site down. If the producing company
wants damages from me it is likely they will have to show malicious intent
>>
Hypothetically: If, as he mentioned, they informed you of the error and you
refused to compluy with the request to fix it, isn't that some sort of de
facto malice? Seems I heard something like that once...
<< AND that they took the steps necessary to protect their releases from
mis-interpretation (such as putting out an SRD). >>
Clerarly identifying OGC as required by the OGL should be sufficient. An SRD
is about the most definitive such identification I can imagine; but other
methods should be sufficient.
Martin L. Shoemaker
Emerald Software, Inc. -- Custom Software and UML Training
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.EmeraldSoftwareInc.com
www.UMLBootCamp.com
-------------
For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org
