Greetings all,

My subject matter today may seem refreshing to you�I
have an Open Game project I'd like to get feedback on,
and it doesn't have ANYTHING to do with D&D3 or the
D20 system! I'm hoping I can get some feedback from
Ryan and other regular list members on these ideas�

I'm very interested in applying the Open Game License
to an ongoing role-playing game system I've been
working on for several years now. This game engine is
specifically designed for any science fiction, comic
book, or anime style setting. As far as I know, this
may the first application of the OGL to a science
fiction style game. It has always been intended to be
modular in design. If you don't like the Psionics
rules as they are, you can write your own alternate
version that can be "substituted" for the current
rules. You can modify existing rules and submit your
own "home" version. You can write expanded mechanics
for existing rules, which can be added on to the
original. It will operate on the same concepts as
FUDGE or FUZION, but will be more streamlined. We want
to get as many RPG designers and contributors to work
on it as possible, in the same vein that Steffan O'
Sullivan did when he worked with members of the
alt.design.games to write FUDGE. I strongly feel this
method of creating a RPG lends itself to the concepts
of Open Gaming and the Open Gaming License. A website
is currently be put together for this project that
will become the home site for the game system.
Contributors can go to the site and access interactive
forms that will allow them to make their additions or
modifications to the game system online. All of this
is easy enough to distinguish as Open Content, as I
read the OGL and the OGL FAQ. As far as I can see, all
of the mechanics will be considered Open Content. This
section concerning the game mechanics will all be
designated a different color than the rest of the
site, making a distinction between it as Open Content
and the rest which will be our Product Identity. What
I'm hoping will work out is that a group could go to
the site, click on each of the rules they prefer, and
put together their own copy of the system tailored to
their tastes in gaming. 

My first question is this:  How exactly should I use
the OGL on my site?
As I understand the OGL and the postings here on the
list, I can use the OGL as written by Ryan as the OGL
for my game system, with modifications made to the
COPYRIGHT NOTICE section to give credit to each person
that contributed to the game. I should have a copy of
the OGL in one primary location on my website, and
each page of my site with Open Content should have a
link back to the primary license page. Is this correct
so far?

Now, for each of the interactive forms that will be
used ( one for submitting weapons, one for powers, one
for an alternate attribute) do I need to include
something like "By hitting the submit button you have
read, understand, and agree to all terms of the Open
Game License presented HERE."?

Would the logo graphic I have designed for the game
system be considered my Trademark, or should it also
be considered Open Content? I would like for others to
be able to use the logo on their works, advertising
their game uses the game system. Right now my thoughts
are that the logo will be our Trademark, and that we
will have to design a different license similar to the
D20 System Trademark license to allow others to use
the Trademark, but still retain control over its use.

Since I am distributing my system as Open Game
Content, anyone else could take the system verbatim,
word for word, from my site and put it in any of their
written works or on their own game site, as long as
they include an updated version of my OGL in their
work. Is this correct?

Any Open Content contributed to the system can also be
used and redistributed by me as long as I give credit
to the person in the COPYRIGHT NOTICE of the OGL I
include with each copy of the work. Sound correct?

If WOTC decided to make a change to the OGL, my game
would be covered under Section 9 of the license as
using a earlier, acceptable version. Is this right?

I can reproduce the "The Open Game License: FAQ"  and
the "Open Game Definitions" from the WOTC site on my
website as long as I include the Copyright notice that
goes with them. Correct? Or should I only put links to
the original pages on the WOTC site?

The Game System is not complete�I consider it to still
be in the heavy development stages. I have nearly 75%
of it completed, but I want to be able to bring others
in to help contribute to it and make changes as
necessary. I have opened a Yahoo group to discuss
various aspects of the game's development�do I need to
include a copy of the OGL that can be accessed from
the group site, or include in the notice for becoming
a member of the group a copy or link to the OGL to let
people know whatever they contribute to the game will
be considered Open Content?

We are also working on a unique Campaign Setting to go
along with the Game System which will include
timeline, histories, characters, stories, creatures,
races, etc. that will all be considered our own
Product Identity, seperate from the Game System. We
plan on introducing this setting as the "default
setting" for the Game System, but put it under a
license that more closely resembles the FUDGE
licenses�you can modify or add to our setting as long
as its for you own entertainment or personal use, but
if you want to publish anything for commercial
purposes then you must apply for a separate license
from us to do so. This will allow anyone to create
material for our setting if they'd like (characters,
stories, adventures, new planets, starships, monsters,
etc.) but not directly profit from it without our
permission. This allows us to maintain intellectual
property over our creations, but be flexible enough to
allow anyone to add to it as well. 

So in closing, for our entire project we will have
four licenses for different things�the Open Game
License for Open Content for the game system, the game
system Trademark logo license, the "FUDGE-like"
license for the Campaign Setting, and the "FUDGE-like"
license for commercial use of material created for the
Campaign Setting. 

Anyone interested finding out more information about
this project please don't hesitate to e-mail me. Our
website should be up and nearly functional in the next
week to week and a half or so. 

Thanks for your time!
Clint Jackson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 




__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/
_______________________________________________
Ogf-l mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l

Reply via email to