Re: [Ogf-l] (f)Trademark definition screwy? New OGL?

[Githianki]

Ok. That makes much more sense now, but I sense a bit of a conflict.  The OGL allows all sorts of modification and almost unrestricted use of OGC. Does that not mean that a trademark contributed to OGC can then be monkied (?) around with (possibly diluting its value)?  It would seem to make little sense then to contribute a trademark to OGC. Finally, does the fact that the trademark restrictions appear in Section 7. mean that only trademarks designated PI need to have secured permission? Given that you indicate some can be contributed to OGC, which wouldn't require permission, I now find this confusing. -Alex Silva