While a theoretical example is good, it's still only theoretical, and I
suspect beneath the radar of caring for the big players.
A lot of people have stuck their neck out for this; to get these people to
act, we have to at least be willing to do the same.
But FWIW...
>A roguelike game is created, using resources from the SRD. This is
>programmed in Java. If I were to state in the license information that
>"Class files X, Y, and Z contain all OGC in this program. The interface
>to these class files is published in files A, B and C." would this be
>acceptable as "clearly indicated?"
You have to make it clear that wherever the text in XYZ appears in ABC, that
text is open.
Since an individual rule can't be copyrighted, there's doubt if a specific
software implementation of a specific rule needs to be OGL'd... but like I
said, we need a specific example that people can pick apart to say "this is
wrong" and "that works" to.
DM
_______________________________________________
Ogf-l mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
