--snip--

--
The OGL published in the magazine (pg 17) only references the OGL and SRD 
copyright.  Since you're supposed to copy the copyright section (#15) 
exactly and then add your own copyright notice, one could easily say that 
you could use any OGC in the article without crediting anyone at all.
--

I'd wager you still need to credit the author by name and the source (d20 
Annual 2001 or whatever it's called.  Don't have mine in front of me.)

--snip--

--
However, the copyright notices in these boxes are, at best, vague and 
noncompliant, and at worst, nonexistent.
--

As I believe has been stated before, WotC has no need to comply with the 
OGL.  They wrote the license and can do whatever they please with their own 
stuff.

--
There's nothing in the OGL about copying copyright information from anywhere 
but Section 15, the copyright in these OGC Trackers is meaningless for OGC 
purposes.
--

Perhaps, but "6.Notice of License Copyright: You must update the COPYRIGHT 
NOTICE portion of this License to include the exact text of the COPYRIGHT 
NOTICE of any Open Game Content You are copying, modifying or distributing, 
and You must add the title, the copyright date, and the copyright holder's 
name to the COPYRIGHT NOTICE of any original Open Game Content you 
Distribute."

--
I think Wizards definitely made an error here.  They either incorrectly took 
OGC from other works and violated their own license, or they licensed that 
material directly from people and did them a grave disservice when 
republishing it (or possibly made a breach of Authority to Contribute, since 
if they licensed it that probably didn't include the right open it without 
proper credit), or maybe there's some other term for it, I suppose they 
could have licensed or bought every article individually, including the 
right to redistribute and Open it without credit, though that seems quite 
unlikely.  But I don't see many other scenarios in which this magazine could 
be a compliant piece of Open Gaming material.  Granted the magazine format 
is new territory, but you'd think if anyone would find a non-loophole and 
100% compliant way, it would be Wizards.
--

I didn't see anything put in the magazine without credit.  As far as I 
remember, all the articles had a "by" line.  As far as compliance, if WotC 
thinks they are in compliance with their own original work, then they are.  
It really is that simple.  The OGC Tracker boxes are farily clear, although 
that is a relative state, on what is OGC.  As far as not breaking the rules 
on giving proper credit, ..."add the title, the copyright date, and the 
copyright holder's name to the COPYRIGHT NOTICE of any original Open Game 
Content you Distribute..."  and you should be fine.

Chad D. Stevens
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

_______________________________________________
Ogf-l mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l

Reply via email to