>From: "Justin Bacon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Faust wrote: >>Lets not be an ass and rip them up too badly based on one of their >>first products. When the CC I was released (the volume you are quoting) >>there was a tremendous amount of uncertainty about the OGL and its uses. >>Their follow on "Relics & Rituals" is a treasure of open content, clearly >>labelled, with almost no strings attached. > >1. I specifically stated all of that in my message, so what's your point?
My point is you don't have a point. You are making sweeping generalizations that are simply not true. >2. SSS could easily rectify the CC 1 issue by simply releasing a "goodies" >license for the appropriate PI on their website. Why should they? I had no trouble extracting the open content. Faust _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
