From: "Richard Stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I have been thinking about the lack of an OGL icon (there isn't one is > there? If there is then ignore the rest and I appologize in advance!). > > The question is, does OGL need a Logo? I would think yes. SImply > saying your product is OGL is lacklust and hard to represent in a easy > to recognise manner. If more companies join on in the future and > release more NON-SRD material into the community it may become very > valuable. > > As I had mentioned in the past I would be more than happy to release > such an Icon as "Open Art" under the OGL. > > Thoughts?
There is a problem, though. How can someone control the use of the OGL logo? I mean someone can slap an OGL logo on a product that contains no OGC and OGL attached to it? All the OGL is mainly a content license. That means we have to draft a trademark license for such an Icon, so that everyone would also comply with the use of that icon (like the d20 trademark), and also allow consumers to easily identify such a thing. _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
