I am a member of the Fantasy Netbook Community Council (FaNCC), formerly
the DnD Community Council (DnDCC). I have submitted to several of our
netbooks material derived from Monte Cook's Ranger variant and S&S's Relics
and Rituals. Those items are still in the review stage, but I have high
hopes that they will be published.
Paul W. King
Message: 4
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 09:39:26 -0800 (PST)
From: John Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Ogf-l] Practical Test of Openness (was OGC Designation (Rant))
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
There has been some vehement debate over the openness of
various usages such as _Creature Collection_ and others. In my
mind, there is a simple test of openness for practical purposes.
What OGC other than the SRD have people actually re-used in
third-party products? (i.e. re-use of Scarred Land by S&SS
doesn't count, since they own the copyright anyway)
Can anyone answer this? I think this is important. If
OGC is never actually used, then its theoretical openness is
irrelevant.
- John
_______________________________________________
Ogf-l mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
