> > My point is: Save the PI designation for the REALLY important stuff. >Don't >> dilute its value by frivolously designating everything as PI. > >Since no two people will ever agree on a definition for "the REALLY >important stuff", I respect the right of creators to decide for themselves. >They're the ones with the financial risk.
another case of perspectives: IMHO, you get no more rights because of financial risk than someone who is "playing it safe". the creators *do* IMHO, get more rights than the consumers--because they are creators. regardless of the financial risk (or it's lack). or do you think that Madonna should have less right of control over her work because, even if she doesn't make a penny on her next album, she'll still be rich beyond the dreams of avarice for the rest of her days? there is no "financial risk" in possibly losing a million dollars when you have a 100 million more--and only need a few-hundred-thousand of those to live on. -- woodelf <*> [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.home.net/woodelph/ If any religion is right, maybe they all have to be right. Maybe God doesn't care how you say your prayers, just as long as you say them. --Sinclair _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
