> > (And, as a side note, OGL compliance has been so spotty that the odds are >> good anyone just ripping stuff off will have screwed up *somewhere*, > > leaving them vulneable. I'm still seeing some odd gaffes from reputable >> publishers. (One book I recently bought used someone else's OGC, thanked >> the original source in the introduction, and failed to include the >> copyright of the derived material in 'Paragraph 15')) >> > >The difficulty of ripping stuff off while maintaining OGL compliance goes up >drastically the more complex you make your Open Content and PI designation; >that's a strong incentive to use complex designations. The side effect of >that is that complex designations also prevent legitimate use, use a >publisher might want to promote.
how do you "rip stuff off" and "maintain OGL compliance" at the same time? if you've maintained compliance, you're only reusing the stuff that they said you could reuse, so where's the "ripping off"? -- woodelf <*> [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.home.net/woodelph/ If any religion is right, maybe they all have to be right. Maybe God doesn't care how you say your prayers, just as long as you say them. --Sinclair _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
