Well,
In my experience that will be a decission for the consumer. Unless you're thinking about them ending up in a database somewhere (In which case they'll be like Foe Hunter I and Foe Hunter II), then people will start to refer to them as "The Good Foe Hunter" and the "Sucky Foe Hunter"... At least that how my players do things.. Which is why I replaced Ranger with a modified version of the Woodsman from Wheel of Time.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 12:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Ogf-l] Foe Hunter from upcoming Masters of the Wild
>You didn't have access to the IP. You're fine and kosher. WotC
>probably even wrote theirs ahead of yours, so they're cool too.
>
>The same thing happened with "Chain Spell" in Relics & Rituals and Tome
>& Blood.
I had forgotten about that. However, IIRC, both Chain Spell feats (I don't have my books in front of me, so I'm running from memory) are almost identical. There is a VERY good chance that the Foe Hunters (WotC's and
mine) will be extremely different, so how does one differentiate? WotC's Foe Hunter and Paul King's Foe Hunter?
Paul W. King
_______________________________________________
Ogf-l mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
