Okay, he suggests this, and he's "Maybe teasing". I ridicule this, and I'm innacurate and irresponsible.
What are you smoking? Clark Wrote: Doug wrote: "You can't refer to it, but if you just *happen* to make a feat with the same mechanic as one in Tome & Blood, and you just *happen* to name it the same thing, WotC might just *happen* to ignore your small violation in the face of much larger violations. That is, as long as you *happen* to stay away from their trademarks and don't do anything stupid." Doug! I cant believe you would say that! I mean, the issue of simultaneous develoment (such as with chain spell) is one thing, but to encourage a clear violation of the license because you think they wont worry about it is wrong and is the kind of thing that would make a company decide not to support the d20 license. Mistakes will happen, but we the producers CANNOT advocate (as you just did above) that little violations are ok. We have to advocate following the license. Maybe you were just teasing, but that is an untenable position. Clark ===== http://www.necromancergames.com "3rd Edition Rules, 1st Edition Feel" __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/ ===== Jasyn Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] "To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield." Ulysses, Alfred Lord Tennyson __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Great stuff seeing new owners in Yahoo! Auctions! http://auctions.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
