The key thing to remember when you're dealing with trademarks is that the "content" of 
the mark is almost totally irrelevant.

All that matters is context.

When a trademark is "registered", the government basically is awarding a monopoly in 
certain contexts for the use of a certain identifier (the trademark) to a company or 
individual for a good or service.  The government does that because it recognizes that 
consumers benefit when they are given some measure of surity that a good really is the 
good they intend to purchase, rather than a potentially inferior good being marketed 
in a way that might have mislead them into making a mistaken purchase.  The trademark 
laws (unlike the copyright laws) are not intended to reward producers - they are 
intended to protect consumers.  Trademark litigation therefore is a situation where 
the trademark holder litigates >on behalf of customers<, rather than on behalf of 
itself.  It has to prove that customers might be confused, not that it might lose 
business.

What that means is that it does not matter how many points of differentiation a mark 
has from a registered trademark.  What matters is that if a court decides that your 
mark is >likely< to cause confusion, or dilute the value of a registered trademark 
(which creates implied confusion for other customers), you can be enjoined from using 
the infringing mark and may face additional damages as well.

If Wizards is successful in their attempt to register the "d20" trademarks (and I 
suspect that they certainly will be), anyone who attempts to create a trade identity 
which is similar to the "d20" trademarks for use in a similar purpose (i.e., the sale 
of roleplaying games) will have to be concerned that they will be sued for 
infringement.

Trademarks are nothing to screw around with.  Unlike a copyright, a company can lose 
it's trademarks if they allow them to become diluted or to become common marks.  One 
way a company can prove that it is working to stop that from happening is to 
agressively pursue cases that are even marginal, to establish a history of having 
taken actions to protect the mark.  Thus, there is often an upside to a company's 
litigation for trademark infringement even if that company expects to lose the case.

My advice remains the same:  Before pursuing a trademark effort, you need to consult 
an attorney who specializes in the field.

Ryan
_______________________________________________
Ogf-l mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l

Reply via email to