>>That is what I thought, however, Mynex from the PCGen development team is saying this: "So here's the deal and this comes from _WotC_ lawyers, so make no mistake this is the situation.
Since PCGen's inception, since the very 1st data files were included, we were OGL compliant. How so? The second ANYONE uses and OGC content, they have accepted the conditions of the OGL."<< That does not make them compliant. In fact it makes them non-compliant. By using our material they are in *violation* of the license because they *have not* implemented it correctly. By using the SRD or any OGC material they fall under the legal constraints of the license - that does not make them compliant. Vast difference. >>This can be somewhat backed up by section 3 of the OGL. I do not currently receive Dragon and Dungeon at the moment. But since they are no longer a publication of WOTC, have they "... accepted the conditions of the OGL"? I don't think that section 3 can be taken out of context like that, can it?<< Since it is our material we may grant any other type of license for that material that we wish. In addition the d20 logo is ours to do with as we wish. AV _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
