On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Tim Dugger wrote: > On 12 Sep 2002, Clark scribbled a note about Re: [Ogf-l] (MM2) WotC violates the: > > > They didnt use CC creatures under the OGL. They > > licensed the content from us. > > now this make even less sense. They licensed them from you, and > then released what they lisenced as OGC..... > > Sorry, but that seems wrong to me.... If it was a special license, > then they should not have released them as OGC at all, nor > included the OGL. But they did include it, so they should have still > updated their section 15...... > > Either way, somebody made a boo-boo....
Not if Clark gave them permission to release the material as OGC they didn't. It's perfectly possible for anyone to release material as OGC that they are not the copyright holder of - all they need is the permission of the copyrght holder. And while it might be nice and less confusing for some if they explained that in the book, they certainly aren't required to. alec _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
