> From: Martin L. Shoemaker [mailto:Martin@;martinlshoemaker.com]
> Suppose I have a document which is entirely OGC. It might be > because the author intentionally declared it as such; or it > might be because the author did a poor job of declaring the > OGC, so the whole document is covered by default. > > Now suppose that document DOES NOT declare the author's logo > as Product Identity. If you have reason to believe that through error or omission a trademark or other content was inadvertantly designated as Open Game Content when normal practice and reasonable examination would indicate that doing so was a mistake, my opinion is that it is in your own best interest not to take advantage of the slip. The purpose of the OGL is to reduce the threat of litigation between game publishers, and doing things which are likely to trigger such a response defeats the purpose of the OGL. Ryan _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
