Alec Burkhardt wrote:
I'm kinda curious about this. I can see how identifying OGC through the use of an OGC appendix is a very dangerous way of declaring OGC (since you would need to be 100% sure that you've duplicated every scrap of OGC or OGC-derived material in the product), but I don't see how the declaration:Or "Chapters 3,4 & 7", "pages 24-38", and a wide variety of other declarations. OGC must be clearly recognizable as OGC every place it occurs. Being clearly identified in one place and then being identified elsewhere as "see the OGL appendix" or "everything that is derivative of the SRD" is not going to pass the reasonable person test. At least not in the opinion of every single person who has some background in the law who has spoken up on this list.
The words "make a skill check at DC 15" are hereby designated as OGC wherever they appear in the text.
Is any less precise, accurate, and reasonable than:
Page 15 is hereby designated as OGC.
Justin Bacon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
_______________________________________________
Ogf-l mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
