--- Jeff Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If it is "correct" to use a phrase like "Everything > derived from the SRD is > OGC" could one then not also use that type of > declaration to deliniate their > PI. For example, "everything derived from [licensed > source or PD source x] > is PI"?
First find me one legally trained person who thinks the phrase "Everything derived from the SRD is OGC" is, by itself, sufficient to meet the clear identification to a reasonable person test, then this might be a worthwhile discussion to open up. Clark has argued that such a phrase is okay as a safety valve just in case the main part of the OGC declaration accidentally misses something that should be OGC. I don't think it really does anything even as a safety catch. Which is pretty much where I remember the two of us leaving the discussion. But neither of us thought that simply saying "Everything derived from the SRD is OGC" was acceptable by itself. There should be a few threads on this in the archives though if you won't a more thorough discussion. alec (the guy with the law degree who's not an attorney) __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
