> As long as you show > what is OGC, then you > satisfy the license. But saying "everything except > the material derived from > the works of Beatrix Potter is OGC" does not show > you what *is* OGC unless you > include the full text of Peter Rabbit and several > other books.
I agree with your general premise as I said in my initial response. I just disagreed with some of the outer edges of the statement. > My point is that you must indicate what sections are > OGC. If you wish to > clarify by also saying that certain sections are > not, then that is OK, but a > negative declaration cannot stand alone. I agree that off the top of my head I cant think of a way to have a negative designation be in and of itself a sufficient designation. Clark ===== http://www.necromancergames.com "3rd Edition Rules, 1st Edition Feel" _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
