Mike Kletch wrote:
8. Identification: If you distribute Open Game Content You
must clearly indicate which portions of the work that you
are distributing are Open Game Content.
So, no. It is there in black and white. You will show what *is* OGC, and a
declaration of what *is not* OGC will not satisfy section 8. "[...] You must
clearly indicate which portions [...] are [OGC]." It doesn't get any clearer
than that. The license TELLS YOU what is clear.
Surely even the six-year old with a highlight is capable of parsing the sentence "everything which is not X is Y" and using it to identify Y?

Justin Bacon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

The six-year old may be able to do it, but that doesn't change the fact that in using the license, we agree to do what it says. As Mike pointed out, the license requires identifying the material in the positive sense.


Chad D. Stevens
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Just my $.02 (USD) worth. Exact change only, please.

_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

_______________________________________________
Ogf-l mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l


Reply via email to