> It could also be the name of the publication itself the has the brand value! > > In either case you are gaining advantage by association.
Except that brand gained value by being part of Wizard's d20 system (OGL or d20) If it didn't (conversion to d20), the publisher opened it up under OGL, knowing full well what it required, hoping to enhance the brand by also being under the d20 system. I would not see a problem with listing a Sec. 15 on the front cover, if the Sec. 15 was the same text size and font as the rest of the license. If they want to take up 90% of the front cover for maybe 2% of the cover associating themselves with another source, I'll laugh at them. If the sec. 15 were in a larger point than the rest of the licence, then I'd see a violation of Sec. 7. If they added a phrase 'Compatible with' in the Sec. 15, then it would definitely fail the 'resonable person' test. Just making it a larger point, but following the license in all other respects, I don't know. But I can tell you that I'd be willing to challenge it if someone tried to use that to associate themselves with my PI. Esp. since they have to agree to sects. 7 and 11 to use the license. Andrew McDougall a.k.a. Tir Gwaith _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
