On Tue, 26 Oct 1999, Brian Paul wrote: > > Since (IIRC) you said that you already have a glGetProcAddress > > of some kind, I'd suggest you call it both glx and glGetProcAddress > > and ship it with 3.1. > > I'd have to call them glXGetProcAddressMESA() and glGetProcAddressMESA() > since the EXT requires some concensus among vendors and the ARB suffix > requires ARB approval. > > I don't want to introduce something that's going to cause a problem > in the near future. But Mesa-isn't-OpenGL...so we don't have to care! ;-) OK - I understand and agree, we need to wait for an EXT/ARB. Steve Baker (817)619-2657 (Vox/Vox-Mail) Raytheon Systems Inc. (817)619-2466 (Fax) Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.hti.com Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://web2.airmail.net/sjbaker1
- [oglbase-discuss] Moving on: Library naming conventions Jon Leech
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] Moving on: Library naming conve... Stuart Anderson
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] Moving on: Library naming c... Stephen J Baker
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] Moving on: Library nami... Stuart Anderson
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] Moving on: Library ... Stephen J Baker
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] Moving on: Library ... Stuart Anderson
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] Moving on: Library naming conve... Brian Paul
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] Moving on: Library naming c... Jon Leech
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] Moving on: Library naming c... Stephen J Baker
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] Moving on: Library nami... Brian Paul
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] Updated GL_EXT_get_... Stephen J Baker
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] Updated GL_EXT_get_proc_address spec akin
