| > - If gl.h knows glext.h exists, why not just include it from gl.h? And if
| > we're going down that road, why have a glext.h at all, the extensions could
| > just go in gl.h. (Remember that the SI was not open source at the time
| > glext.h was conceived, do we wish to revisit this decision?)
|
| I think someone suggested that gl.h include glext.h but that was shot
| down for some reason. Anyone remember why?
This seems like the obvious answer to me too. Anyone making progress
on remembering the objection?
david
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Let's finish this puppy Mark Kilgard
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Let's finish this puppy Mark Kilgard
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Let's finish this puppy John R. Dennis
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Let's finish this puppy Michael Gold
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] Let's finish this puppy Jon Leech
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] Let's finish this puppy Brian Paul
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] GL_HAS_GLEXT David Blythe
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] GL_HAS_GLEXT Jim_Cobb
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Let's finish this puppy Michael Gold
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Let's finish this puppy Ron Bielaski
