| >  - If gl.h knows glext.h exists, why not just include it from gl.h?  And if
| > we're going down that road, why have a glext.h at all, the extensions could
| > just go in gl.h.  (Remember that the SI was not open source at the time
| > glext.h was conceived, do we wish to revisit this decision?)
| 
| I think someone suggested that gl.h include glext.h but that was shot
| down for some reason.  Anyone remember why?

This seems like the obvious answer to me too.  Anyone making progress
on remembering the objection?
        david

Reply via email to