http://gilgamesh.hamsterrepublic.com/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=422
------- Comment #18 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-19 11:03 ------- (In reply to comment #17) > Well, to be fair, FB's behaviour is perfectly valid. Generally you don't > expect > people to jump in AND out of loops. I think it's intended, not a bug. (And we > were lucky that it worked before) I could not call FB's behaviour here valid. Either jumps in loops should work, or jumps in loops should be a fatal error. Memory corruption is never okay, even if the code is shockingly inelegant. > The warning it gives me refers to a label that doesn't exist in the assembly! > But the warning is valid. > > But hang on, do you get those bug 377 warnings when compiing with FB0.16 or > 0.17? I assumed you were using 0.16. 0.16 0.17 and 0.18 all provide(ed) me with a different (and increasing) set of branch crossing warnings. I have long since fixed the ones that appeared for 0.16. Something like 2 remain with 0.17, and there are about 10 or so with 0.18 (none of which seem to be related to this bug) -- Configure bugmail: http://gilgamesh.hamsterrepublic.com/cgi-bin/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. _______________________________________________ Ohrrpgce mailing list [email protected] http://lists.motherhamster.org/listinfo.cgi/ohrrpgce-motherhamster.org
