On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Garrett D'Amore <[email protected]> wrote: > And to those of you running OI "in production", you're nuts. OI has had > exactly "one" release (of dubious quality), and has a sum total of a > half dozen engineers behind it; and I'm not sure all of them are > actually software engineers and not just integrators. I sure as heck > don't advocate illumos for production use *yet*, even though my own > desktop runs it. (Although I'm working hard to get it into a condition > when I will be happy to do so.)
1. http://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/Frequently+Asked+Questions#FrequentlyAskedQuestions-WhatistherelationshipbetweenOpenIndianaandIllumos%3F 2. http://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/Available+IPS+Repositories — there is a placeholder for http://pkg.openindiana.org/illumos As of points are totally valid and OI should move to Illumos, yet nobody went around to insult people called them "nuts" or "fools" (on IRC), who made a mistake to use that super-buggy Nexenta, that was constantly losing dependencies, screwing up APT and is based on a prehistoric Debian repos. Maybe we also should join nexenta-dev@ and yapping all the users are morons that using it, what you think? And because of that never happend, Anil could do a great job, trying to fix that stuff step by step. If I were you, I would apologize for this. P.S. I don't really give a hoot about 151a or "too little / too late", because some of our machines are running snv_127 and older, some of them has even Solaris 8, which is old enough to get another "nut" award. :-( -- Kind regards, BM Things, that are stupid at the beginning, rarely ends up wisely. _______________________________________________ oi-dev mailing list [email protected] http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
