ken mays <[email protected]> wrote: > > LKP is different from lxrun as it does not simply catch > > syscalls via signals > > but creates a Linux infrastructure under /linux. Linux > > programs run chroot()ed > > in /linux and can see the UNIX infrastructure under /unix. > > > > For this reason, it is easy to have the "right" things in > > /proc and /etc. > > > > BTW: my information is from people who have been in the > > team or have been very > > close to the team. > > > > Jörg > > Hi Jorg, > > That sounds about right as I was one of those people using and testing out > Linux native binaries on Solaris/OpenSolaris for many years in production > environments. Most of us got pretty far as having CentOS/Redhat 5.x binaries > running natively. > > Kinda 'old-school' now, but I think there is still a need for it.
This is why I thought a short description of the original implementaion from SCO might help to find a way for creating a successor of the phased out BrandZ. The basic code (e.g. a Linux /proc fs, ...) is available, so the effort to implement such a successor should not be that big. Jörg -- EMail:[email protected] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin [email protected] (uni) [email protected] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily _______________________________________________ oi-dev mailing list [email protected] http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
