* Gordon Ross <[email protected]> [2011-08-06 17:21]: > On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 5:00 AM, Guido Berhoerster <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hello Alasdair, > [...] > > I suppose you mean that the contributor hg exports all changesets > > and the committer then uses "hg import --no-commit"? If so, then > > yes, that would do it. In that case we use something like > > ----8<---- > > <bug no> bug description > > Author: Name <email> > > Reviewed by: Name <email> > > Reviewed by: Name <email> > > [...] > > ---->8---- > > as the format for commit message? > > FYI, we use "hg commit -u $original_author" in illumos, which puts the > original author's email in the change set author. If you do that, then an > "Author: ..." field would be redundant.
Right, that would be a possibility, however we'd probably need to introduce a Committed by: or Sponsored by: field since hg doesn't distinguish between author/committer. > Otherwise, the above suggestion looks like what we've been doing > over in illumos. > > BTW, the reason for: bugid description... and the subsequent lines > (with no blank lines) is that with onnv-tools, the "hg-active" command > will produce an output file that works with "webrev -w ..." > Not sure if you care about that, but I find it handy. Right, the idea is to follow the common and established Sun/Oracle/Illumos format. While we currently we don't use webrev, a standardized and machine-processable format is useful anyway and we might make use of it in a future toolset. -- Guido Berhoerster _______________________________________________ oi-dev mailing list [email protected] http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
