On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 14:57 -0400, Richard Lowe wrote: > I think that that looks correct. > > That said, you're unlikely to find anyone overly thrilled by the idea > of rebuilding (all of) SFW, so you may want to check if folks are > willing to dock a new package and re-import to get the update, or > whether they'd prefer an oi-build based way to do it, or... well, I > don't know.
To try to put it briefly: if I were really moving forward, I'd that in oi-build (where a later version of Mercurial is already in place for sustaining). As I'm just doing some minor shifting (sideways instead of forward, as it were), it seemed simpler to do this with the existing build system, which I'm modestly tweaking for the package. > (I'd like to note that I'm suggesting that moving it to oi-build for > sustaining is *correct*, just a lot more likely to get traction as far > as it actually getting published afterward) > > -- Rich > > _______________________________________________ > oi-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ oi-dev mailing list [email protected] http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
