On Sun, 2011-11-06 at 04:34 -0500, Alex Viskovatoff wrote: > On Sun, 2011-11-06 at 04:15 +0000, Bayard G. Bell wrote: > > I think fuse support is something that > > should be coordinated with the illumos upstream, including giving > > SFE-maintained patches a long-term home. > > Why do you hate SFE? There's nothing short-term about it.
[snip] You've misunderstood the sense in which I call invoke a "short-term". I mean that in term of having an upstream to accept patches. I've yet to run into a porting project that loves carrying an accumulation of patches that lack an upstream or upstream acceptance. When I speak of a need to fork and suggest that the SFE patches should be reviewed for acceptance by the new upstream, I can't see how that's a dig against SFE. Others have read and responded to my remarks and understood them as intended, and I see no reasonable basis for further claims that I "hate" SFE and "continually" dismiss and deride it in any form. If you're concerned that something I've said could be mistaken for a negative remark about SFE, I'd happily respond to a question seeking clarification, but I don't count being flamed on a public list as a reasonable response, certainly not when you're posting after other responses that have heard me in my intended register. I hope and expect that you will withdraw your remarks for such reasons. Regards, Bayard _______________________________________________ oi-dev mailing list [email protected] http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
