I have berkeleydb-5.1 at dilos-userland(from oracle-userland with additional build flags for DEB tools) - works well with DEB tools such as: reprepro, apt
You can try to check it on my IPS shared repo at http://apt.dilos.org:10000/: database/[email protected],5.11-1.1.1:20120219T012952Z <http://apt.dilos.org:10000/info/0/database%2Fberkeleydb-5%405.1.25%2C5.11-1 .1.1%3A20120219T012952Z> Best regards, -Igor From: Bayard Bell <[email protected]> Reply-To: <[email protected]> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:59:47 +0000 To: OpenIndiana Developer mailing list <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> Subject: [userland] Re: [oi-dev] 1262 Berkeley-db package > Was this ever committed? I reckon we need libdb (I need it for something ATM), > and I don't find it in the history. I'm happy to pick this up and run with it. > > Cheers, > Bayard > > On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Guido Berhoerster <[email protected]> > wrote: >> * Alasdair Lumsden <[email protected]> [2011-10-05 01:31]: >>> > >>> > On 3 Oct 2011, at 23:31, Bayard G. Bell wrote: >>> > >>>> > > On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 17:08 -0400, Alex Viskovatoff wrote: >>>>> > >> On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 16:34 -0400, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote: >>>>>> > >>> Bayard made a good point, one will generally want multiple versions of >>>>>> > >>> bdb. >>>>>> > >>> Thoughts about having bdb-4.8 (and bdb-5.2)? >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> Can you or he give examples of why one would want that? It would be a >>>>> > >> nuisance, because one would have to decide on some naming convention, so >>>>> > >> that multiple versions could be installed together. Do Linux >>>>> > >> distributions ship multiple versions of bdb? >>>> > > >>>> > > Ubuntu, for example, delivers libdb4.6, libdb4.7, and libdb4.8 for >>>> > > libraries. (I'm running BackTrack 5, which is based off 10.04, so this >>>> > > is a bit dated.) The distro simply doesn't deliver any links to the >>>> > > libraries, so everything has to decide which version to link against by >>>> > > both major and minor version. I've ended up with one each for the core C >>>> > > runtime because I have essentially three packages, each using a >>>> > > different version. I've seen similar things in other porting >>>> > > environments, which leads me to suspect that, if there's a nuisance >>>> > > argument, it's that, as a porting system carries more packages, it >>>> > > decides the greatest nuisance is forcing them all to use one version of >>>> > > BDB. >>> > >>> > That's an important point. >>> > >>> > That presumably means drop: >>> > >>> > link path=usr/lib/libdb-4.so target=libdb-4.8.so <http://libdb-4.8.so> >>> > link path=usr/lib/libdb.so target=libdb-4.8.so <http://libdb-4.8.so> >> >> You should have those links at least for the "default version" so >> the linker finds it when passed -ldb. >> -- >> Guido Berhoerster >> >> _______________________________________________ >> oi-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev > > illumos-userland | Archives > <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/191052/=now> > <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/191052/22234452-ff4867aa> | > Modify > <https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=22234452&id_secret=22234452-720b247 > f> Your Subscription <http://www.listbox.com>
_______________________________________________ oi-dev mailing list [email protected] http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
