Magnus <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sep 3, 2012, at 10:24 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote: > > > > Looks like you missunderstand the problem and that your understanding is > > one of > > the reasons for the existing problems. > > I'm not so sure that I misunderstand. I understand that OpenSolaris != > OpenIndiana. They have a common ancestry, but they are two different things > made by two different organizations. > > OpenSolaris is dead, the organization responsible for it has mostly buried > it, and we should only be referring to it in the past-tense.
It may be that your mistake is to believe that "OpenSolaris" is a distro? The real name of that distro was "Indiana" and Indiana is of course dead. I am however talking about OpenSolaris.....and this is a generic OS classification. SchilliX is the oldest distro based in OpenSolaris, Indiana started much later but is also nothing than a distro based on OpenSolaris. OpenSolaris is still alive.... Jörg -- EMail:[email protected] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin [email protected] (uni) [email protected] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily _______________________________________________ oi-dev mailing list [email protected] http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
