On 12 July 2013 13:49, G B <[email protected]> wrote: > /hipster should be the -current like FreeBSD > /dev should be -stable like FreeBSD > /release or /stable should be -RELEASE like FreeBSD > > /hipster can keep having its breakage, that is fine. But what I'd see is > /dev get illumos-gate updates and tested and when no problems are found and > it is stable, then get promoted to /release, and keep this cycle. > > Thus, /dev and /release will be sunstudio, but I don't know how one can > get /hipster promoted to /dev because of gcc. > > I guess it could be that /hipster always stays out there as a -current > while /dev and /release stay with sunstudio because right now /dev is most > rock-solid and that should not be taken away. While /hipster has newer > packages available, if someone is on /dev or /release there are other > options rather than trying to get what is in /hipster. opencsw.org has > many current packages available, so anyone using /dev and /release can get > them from opencsw.org. > > Important question over here:
Are we ever going to promote hipster to /dev or /release then? This is question in particular due to gcc/sunstudio differences. Cheers, Erol
_______________________________________________ oi-dev mailing list [email protected] http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
