Hi Andy, you are probably right with the versioning, it might produce quite some compatibility issues among different Illumos distros if we share codebase. Same applies to Solaris though code sharing is probably not likely to happen. :-)
@Andrzej, Adam, Ken, Alex, et al: what do you recommend here? Setup own Illumos shared library symbol versioning for newer things than already present in the repo? Cheers, Erol On 15 July 2013 16:59, Andy Stormont <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Erol, > > I ask because if it's not taken from an Oracle update then it might be > better to use something else, like ILLUMOS_1.0. Otherwise you may end up > with a SUN_1.3 version table that doesn't match up with what Oracle are > shipping. May or may not be a big deal - depends how much you care about > compatibility with Solaris 11 - if at all. > > Andy. > > On 15 Jul 2013, at 15:39, Erol Zavidic <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Andy, > > SUNW_1.3 is an incremental increase for the new symbols that came after > the latest released version (1.2.3). Upstream userland still carries 1.2.3 > and ec-userland is with zlib without symbols. > > Cheers, > Erol > > > On 15 July 2013 15:58, Andy Stormont <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> mapfile changes look good, but where did the SUNW_1.3 version come from? >> >> Andy. >> >> On 15 Jul 2013, at 14:53, ken mays <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Erol, >> >> Your build and patches now look good for zlib-1.2.8 migration to /hipster. >> >> Be aware of the changes needed for: >> >> [email protected],5.11-0.133:20130305T140733Z >> consolidation/sfw/[email protected] >> ,5.11-0.151.1.8:20130305T142156Z >> >> Just so nothing slips through the cracks during the migration - once >> approved. >> >> ~ Ken Mays >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From:* Erol Zavidic <[email protected]> >> *To:* oi-dev <[email protected]> >> *Sent:* Monday, July 15, 2013 9:32 AM >> *Subject:* Re: [oi-dev] Bumping zlib to 1.2.8 >> >> Folks, >> >> another try to bump zlib to v1.2.8, this time with symbols in libraries. >> >> Here's the diff: >> https://github.com/erolms/oi-userland/compare/zlib_v2?expand=1 >> >> Cheers, >> Erol >> >> >> On 11 July 2013 20:33, Erol Zavidic <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Folks, >> >> I bumped zlib to the latest version. The update should be backwards >> compatible, but dependency list is long and something might break. Need >> your assistance here. >> One of the issues that has to be resolved _before_ updating zlib is to >> update libxml2 to a version higher that 2.7.6. In 2.7.6 there is a nasty >> bug, fiddling with zlib internal structures, causing libxml2 coredump with >> newer zlib versions. I will look into libxml2 recipe later on/tomorrow. >> >> Here's the diff for review, please comment. Thx. >> https://github.com/erolms/oi-userland/compare/zlib >> >> Cheers, >> Erol >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> oi-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> oi-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> oi-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev >> > > _______________________________________________ > oi-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > oi-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev >
_______________________________________________ oi-dev mailing list [email protected] http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
