On 07/19/13 12:06 PM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote: > On 07/19/2013 13:57, Jim Klimov wrote: >> On 2013-07-19 11:51, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote: >> >>>>> Maybe indeed a C++ incompatibility ? >> >>> Welcome to the world of binary incompatiblitly, now the last >>> fortress has finally been conquered..... >> >> Which moves me to think: would this example mean that legacy >> applications built for Solaris 10 and older, running now on >> obsolete deployments which might be targeted for upgrade to >> OI, would likely not run on newer hipster-based GCC-compiled >> OS releases? >> > > I had Oracle 10gR2/11gR2 running on OpenSolaris b134 at home. I'm > eager to check it on OI-hipster, but don't have enough time. Something > tells me it is likely to fail.. Maybe it would work before 2013-07-14 12:21 Hipster. Maybe that is the lesson to keep breaking stuff to itself and/or not using it in any production.
Please don't try in Hipster, it is rolling release, hot even /dev. Try latest OI /dev, saying 151a7 , that you can upgrade from opensolaris 134, anyway. _______________________________________________ oi-dev mailing list [email protected] http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
