Is there a plan to do anything about this illumos build noise for hipster? Or what was the response to this "flag day" for OI? The easy thing would be to just deliver what illumos needs in /usr/lib, including libstdc++.so.6 and libgcc_s.so.1 (and the symbolic links etc) so that legacy binaries will just work. A later version of libgcc_s.so would be fine also, as long as it's link-time compatible (and normally it is).
Thanks, Gordon ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Robert Mustacchi <[email protected]> Date: Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 2:06 PM Subject: Re: [developer] libgcc_s.so and libstdc++.so showing up in builds To: Richard PALO <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] On 09/07/2013 10:34 AM, Richard PALO wrote: > I hope that gcc4.4 run-time doesn't have to be installed to run now. If you build illumos with gcc as the primary compiler the appropriate runtime libraries are always required, nothing has changed about that. What's changed recently is automatically setting the RPATH to include /usr/sfw/lib where Sun and thus others have historically put the gcc 3.x runtime libraries. See the flag day / heads up notice for more information: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/182179/2013/08/search/S2VpdGg/sort/time_rev/page/2/entry/2:60/20130816122950:0D0E0388-0691-11E3-81F4-BC81DE2C0CE4/ ------------------------------------------- illumos-developer Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/182179/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/182179/21175075-7ec767c8 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21175075&id_secret=21175075-4a7cd1de Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com -- Gordon Ross <[email protected]> Nexenta Systems, Inc. www.nexenta.com Enterprise class storage for everyone
_______________________________________________ oi-dev mailing list [email protected] http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
