On 02/19/2016 13:57, Aurélien Larcher wrote:
Let's rename some categories so that they more correspond to fmris:
archiver # archiver/*, compress/*
closed # closed source components
database (database/*, service/database/*)
developer (developer/*, library/*) # development tools and libraries
desktop (desktop/*) # gnome, enlightenment, common tools
encumbered
font # (system/font/*, print/filter/ghostscript/fonts/*)
games (games/*)
image (image/*)
input-method (system/input-method)
metapackages
multimedia (audio/*, video/*)
network (serive/network/*, network/*)
openindiana # illumos and OI-specific software
shell (shell/*)
sysutils (security/*, backup/*, test/*, etc)
text (text/*)
web (web/*)
x11 (x11/*)
This looks good.
My only remark is that library/ may not live in 'develope'r if we agree
that 'developer' should only contain development tools while 'library'
components are in general just providers of functionalities, not limited to
development. Therefore 'library' could live at the top.
Also I would like to keep 'scientific'.
Hi, Aurélien.
I agree on library top level category. However, I suppose scientific
components can live in library and developer to better correlate with fmris.
--
Best regards,
Alexander Pyhalov,
system administrator of Southern Federal University IT department
_______________________________________________
oi-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev